• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Not way back, American schoolchildren realized a quaint ta­le in historical past class about the nation's first president. It had to do with a precocious George Washingto­n chopping down a cherry tree against his dad and mom' needs. When confronted by his offended father, Washington had to determine whether or MemoryWave Community not to lie and Memory Wave avoid punishment or personal as much as the offense. Because the tale goes, young Washington replied that he couldn't inform a lie and confessed to axing the tree. Right now, we know that Washington did no such thing. When archaeologists found the location of Washington's boyhood house in 2008, they discovered no cherry timber on the landscape. The story was fabricated by early Washington biographer Mason Locke Weems to bolster the primary president's heroic image. Omitting the cherry tree story from curriculum had no important influence on our collective memory of George Washington and made him no less essential to shaping the early history of the United States.

Scholars discover inconsistencies or outright fallacies in historical narratives and make the required edits, or they look at the reasoning behind historic info. Was George Washington actually heroic? How did his character mold the United States in its infancy? Retracing recorded history might be extra like navigating a minefield than pleasantly strolling down memory lane. That's because the past isn't all the time as easy because the initial model of the story would have you imagine. Revisionist history is complicated by the very fact that folks's identities are strongly linked to their histories; challenging long-held claims about past occasions attracts criticism and controversy. The sector itself is not lower and dry -- revisionist historians work from angle­s. ­Since the times of ancient Greek and Roman scholars, such as Plutarch and Tacitus, folks have been editing recorded history. However trendy historical revisionism originated in the 20th century, after the primary global army battle that shocked the world: World War I. The aftermath of the conflict would alter the best way students and laymen alike considered historic preservation.

The time period "revisionist historical past" can be similarly imprecise when standing alone because it normally connotes one of the three perspectives mentioned on the earlier web page. Let's consider the legacy of Thomas Jefferson to grasp how one can apply these different perspectives. People settle for that Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence and served because the third president of the United States. However another biographical reality is that Jefferson had a slave mistress named Sally Hemings, with whom he fathered youngsters. Regardless of folks's discomfort with that nugget of information, DNA proof in the late 1990s confirmed it was true. So what did that discovery mean for revisionist historians? From a reality-checking perspective, the evidence of the affair and the offspring was enough to advantage exploration of the Jefferson-Hemings relationship in new biographical accounts of Jefferson. Until DNA proof proved the Jefferson-Hemings affair, skeptics who held the destructive perspective maintained that the claim was false revisionist historical past meant to sully the Founding Father's legacy.

Similar to a journalist must report occasions devoid of bias, so should the historian. However full objectivity is nearly not possible since history typically takes the type of a steady, chronological narrative. That sense of continuity helps us grasp concepts, however in reality, events do not occur all the time in perfect sequence like a path of dominos. The roots of trendy revisionism sprang from that theoretical struggle for objectivity. Once the dust settled to some extent after World War I, historians were left with the big task of sorting by way of the rubble. How would the military conflict be depicted in the years to return? How did the international locations concerned contribute to the battle? Attempting to reply such questions, historians realized that full objectivity was unattainable. Even selecting what to incorporate and omit about the battle felt subjective. This was an issue scholars had wrestled with for the reason that late nineteenth century. The conditions of the Treaty of Versailles that effectively ended the struggle in 1919 contained severe punishments for Germany and Memory Wave planted the seeds of modern revisionism.